An increased number of juvenile criminal cases have been observed around the world which implicates a drastic drop in the age of the offenders of the law. Uncontrolled usage of the internet and a lot of freedom seem to be the plausible reason for the increasing numbers.
Although the internet has become a necessity rather than a commodity, excessive usage of networks provides people with a lot of information that youngsters are not capable of processing. It has never been easier to download or upload content in the form of audio, videos, and images on the social media platforms like Instagram which spreads information like forest fires with just the click of a button. Through sources like these many times, the skills to make the right judgment get affected. This indirectly confuses many people to differentiate the wrong among the right and ultimately hinders their decision-making skills. Parents of adolescents and young adults can introduce a rather controlled environment for the usage of the internet. Restricting applications such as Facebook and limiting the time of usage could bring in impressive results within a few months. Students may continue to use their gadgets and the internet provided that they follow a strict schedule.
Furthermore, as children grow up they tend to exploit their curfew timings and gradually begin to spend long durations of time outside the home. These rather lengthy evenings may bring in an uninvited company such as contact with other lawbreakers who may manage to wrongly influence youngsters into partaking in criminal offenses. Street thugs may be lurking around at night sometimes to grab a hold of innocent citizens and obligate them into wrongdoings. In a report by the New York Times, more than half of the criminals serving their time have given statements saying that they were forced into committing the crime while they were returning back home late at night. Such harsh penalties can be avoided if the guardians impose a night curfew. Fresh graduates and young working employees can report home on time and escape any unavoidable situations like those. Maintaining and following schedules as these can bring about a drastic change in numbers among the criminal offenses caused by younger adults.
In conclusion, crimes will continue to take place around the world, but the statistics of these occurrences can be mitigated. Introducing a small restriction on internet usage and deploying a curfew can significantly drop the number of crimes carried out by younger people globally.
- Experts say that if older people exercise daily they will be healthier and happier However many still suffer from a lack of fitness What are the reasons for this What actions can be taken to solve this problem 73
- Do you think that people who work online at home are more productive than office workers or the other way around Give reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Being literate in technology or the internet is so popular that many believe that it will no longer be necessary to read conventional books as the main source of material for education To what extent do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examp 78
- Some people think it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinion as them Other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Nowadays in some countries around the world men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development what are the effects on society and family life 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 638, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returning'.
Suggestion: returning
...to committing the crime while they were returning back home late at night. Such harsh penaltie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nal offenses caused by younger adults. In conclusion, crimes will continue to t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23414634146 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78830309442 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2935381197 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0669119724466 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0202658929359 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236884311128 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0400564654676 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260284549337 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 638, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returning'.
Suggestion: returning
...to committing the crime while they were returning back home late at night. Such harsh penaltie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nal offenses caused by younger adults. In conclusion, crimes will continue to t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23414634146 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78830309442 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2935381197 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0669119724466 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0202658929359 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236884311128 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0400564654676 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260284549337 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.