Some people think that there should be some strict controls
about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as
they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Whether strict racket regulations should be made public to combat noise pollution is a controverail issue. From my perspective, avoiding noise in surrounding environment is impossible ; however, noise management is necessary for a high living standard.
On one hand, noise is important for a variety of events such as football games, wedding ceremonies, and so on. To put it another way, loud music not only helps spectators gain energy, but it also helps everyone relieve tension and relax. Additionally, various types of noise-blocking technology, such as soundproofing doors, windows, and foam panels, are now available. These allow people to indulge in their vices without disturbing others. However, they are not always implemented everywhere, and as a result, a commotion may occur, causing annoyance to others in the vicinity.
On the other hand, It is also easy to find that Sound disruption should be managed due to several drawbacks. To begin with, rumpuses have a significant impact on the health and well-being of others. This is due to the fact that when high-frequency waves strike the cochlea, it becomes numb and, in some circumstances, fractures. Furthermore, interfering with people's job is unfriendly and impolite. High-volume music has a negative impact on school-aged pupils because it distracts them from their studies, particularly in the listening segment.
To summarize, while people have the freedom to generate noise, it should be controlled in order to avoid compromising the health of others. As a result, it is suggested that this be followed in an orderly manner so that everyone has access to it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-16 | mbn250 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Lee Daisy | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Lee Daisy | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | harry@uppal | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an orderly manner" with adverb for "orderly"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., it is suggested that this be followed in an orderly manner so that everyone has access to it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.316 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98268335564 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5008623063 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9285714286 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228156317359 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669696650486 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730824347543 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13972497964 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106646626077 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.