The bar chart illustrates data on the changes in the proportion of the population living on their own categorized into five distinct ages of groups in America, throughout fifteen decades, starting from 1850.
In general, the figure for senior citizens aged 55 to 64 was particularly far higher than that of the remaining groups in 1950 and 2000. Additionally, all five categories experienced overall increases with appearances of younger age groups in 1900 for 27-36 years old and in 1950 for 17-26 years old.
More specifically, the 55-to-64 group had the highest percentage of people living alone, with roughly 3% in 1850, rising significantly to 17% in 2000. Meanwhile, despite starting at around 2% in 1850, the figure for people in the age range of 37-46 and 47-54 experienced rapid growth to 7% and 13% in 2000, respectively.
On the other hand, the younger generations from 27 to 36 and 17 to 26 had shown a strong tendency to keep themselves since 1950, with about 2% for each category. However, by 2000, their figures had witnessed sharp increases to 5% and 8% accordingly.
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The picture below shows the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below the poverty line in three states in the USA 73
- Some people believe that parents have a great influence on children s growth but influences from the outside play a more important role Do you agree or disagree 80
- The diagram shows the process of making orange juice 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or 27-36 years old and in 1950 for 17-26 years old. More specifically, the 55-...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96721311475 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87653927261 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8266891368 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.857142857 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256805120131 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117091002762 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789415790914 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155830287049 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861318290543 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.