Many people prefer to watch foreign films than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
It is true that foreign films are more popular than domestically produced films. There are several reasons why this phenomenon has occurred.
In my opinion we need three important elements to make a good film. These factors include creativity, talent, and budget. Foreign film producers and directors are willing to take the risk when it comes to creating new, whereas local film makers are still creating the same type of content. A producer’s primary task is choosing good film crews including famous director, professional sound recorder and other film crews. When it comes to creativity local productions are not even close to overseas’. In foreign film industries especial western, there are many talented actors and actress that play in high quality. Despite many talented people of all ages, local film directors use repetitive individuals who have only good face. Producer should substitute new talented players with old ones who can not play new roles or new characters. For instance, “Amin Hayaee” is one of my favorite actors has played similarly since his famous film that was named “Akhrajiha”. His movement, make up, even his walking has been constant without any changing. Being up date is an inherent challenge for any individual; I think he must be retirement. Iranian writers and producers have a book like a cookbook and they are just repeating the recipes again and again.
To accomplish great things, we must not only have talent but also Money, playing main role to each industry. We can not deny the fact budgets of local films can not compare with huge budget foreign films. They invest a lot of money to create fantastic movies difference from previously products. Local film makers do not have this opportunity. In my view, government should give financial support for this field. Based on data, South Korea in recent years could make a lot of money from sell entertainments. Governments can raise GDP (one of the economy variable) by investing in this industry and income from sales. They can identify talented people and give them scholarship to study overseas, specially the US being pioneer in this filed. End of all, I think film maker can use foreign actors and actress. Using them is a revolutionary idea, but it will be expensive.
In conclusion, I believe that financial aid can promote local films that can compete with others even Hollywood that dominate of this industry.
- The graph shows the number of cases of X diseases in Iran between 196 and 1995 56
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups, UK 1990. 11
- The graph shows consumption of energy in the U S since 1980 with projections through 2030 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century. So protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree agree? 84
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...al sound recorder and other film crews. When it comes to creativity local production...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, still, whereas, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1179245283 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66393780215 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2509294282 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.32142857143 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 8.67935871743 242% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.519770166487 0.244688304435 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144483981958 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146726927689 0.0667982634062 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382959889532 0.151304729494 253% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.272276288026 0.056905535591 478% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.