People have different views with regard to the question of how to make our roads safer. In my opinion, both punishment and a range of other ways can be used together to improve road safety.
On the one hand, aggressive driving is a serious problem on our roads, so strict punishment such as heavy and small fine, suspension Driving license, serve a prison for serious offenders, and even confiscate their cars can help to reduce the accidents. The aim of these punishments is that reckless driver understands that their behavior has negative consequences. I think road users tend to drive more safety after receiving penalty. AS a result, this way contributes to deter and force road-users to obey to traffic laws more strictly.
On the other hand, most people believe that strict punishment can be effective but only solves part of problems. Different approaches should be taken into account in various situations. In comparison to the past, more and more people have car and use personal car to commute. So, local authorities should improve public transport systems in order to reduce using personal vehicles. Secondly, governments can offer better education in schools and special classes for volunteer in order to obtain driving license. Next is install warning sign in road’s neighborhood can say them the speed limitation and other important thing. Finally, vehicle quality should be checked every year, which one doesn’t have minimum standard quality will be banded from coming to streets and roads.
In conclusion, while harsher punishment can help to keep the safe on the roads. I believe that there are alternative ways that minimize traffic jam and accidents.
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Whycould this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 56
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- U.S. Energy Consumption by fuel 78
- The graph gives information about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 84
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'installed'.
Suggestion: installed
...rder to obtain driving license. Next is install warning sign in road’s neighborhood can...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19852941176 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65969207573 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632352941176 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.51377815 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150996336144 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508670837685 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421618244943 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984983736949 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377797678565 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.