There are two opposing views about personality traits that can be contributed by instincts while some argue that things gained from life have greater effects on people. From my perspective, I firmly cite that both characteristics and living experiences are the two vital factors to form individuals.
First, it is undeniable that predispositions could have an impact on the personalities of people. This is because people are inherited family genes such as behavioral traits or personality ones, hence, tend to act similarly to their parents. This is particularly the case for those who grow into persistent or introverted people like their mothers and fathers. Second, characteristics even noticeably influence a people’s development. Inheriting singularities from parents through the genes system, these people therefore could gain inborn talents which not all people may possess. To illustrate, numerous musical prodigies were born with an ever-great ability of music from their family then achieved numerous prizes and gained prominence globally.
On the contrary, it is universally acknowledged that externalities are also a contributory factor to a person’s traits and improvements. People not only inherit their parent’s characteristics but also be affected by others ranging from their job requirements, the surrounding environments to people they contact daily. These factors, therefore, could change people’s mindsets as well as their behaviors which make them live differently. Additionally, indeed, the more environments people live in, the more adaptable ability they have. A person, for instance, could grow from an easy-going one into a strict one because of his high discipline in the working environment.
To conclude, people’s opinions differ as to personality traits and developments are attributed to characteristics or gained experiences from life. With the aforementioned ideas, I am convinced that these factors both play a crucial role to form a person.
- The chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010 78
- FEWER YOUNG PEOPLE DO FARMING WORK IN RURAL AREAS WHY SHOULD YOUNG PEOPLE ENCOURAGED TO DO FARMING WORK 84
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 78
- The chart below gives information about levels of education by age range and educational level by gender in Glasgow in 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding environments'?
Suggestion: the surrounding environments
...rs ranging from their job requirements, the environments around them to people they contact daily. These fac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72635135135 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30119777884 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3018648777 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14649209374 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556549896115 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398104102977 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100231385616 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186293405668 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.