In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
To the best of my knowledge, famine is currently omnipresent in most underdeveloped countries, even though improvements in agriculture have been made recently. I strongly support the idea that this problem primarily results from the indecisive policies of governments and external factors of the environment. If the authorities took more serious actions and took more protective measures into account, the famine might not be as severe as it is.
That the governments' failure to address this problem and postpone proposing any further practices is making more and more people suffer from hunger. Citizens cannot solve the problem by themselves. It is believed that the authorities are the ones in charge of resolving and rescuing their residents whenever any trouble appears. Therefore, the more neglectful the governments are, the more worrying the starvation becomes. Take the Vietnam famine of 1945 as an example. Without harsh policies and over-exploitation of the enemies at that time, Vietnam in 1945 might not have experienced that nightmare. For this reason, coming up with any solution in order to address this problem seems to be the top priority at the moment. As for me, I highly recommend that governments put forward and offer practices related to food trade or job opportunities (to enhance the quality of life) as soon as possible so that food is affordable for most of their citizens.
Another reason for this scarcity of food is believed to be the elements of the environment, such as natural disasters like droughts, floods, etc. This appears to destroy the agricultural facilities completely, which is a determinant key to the amount of food produced and associated with the widespread shortage of food. To illustrate, African countries, which were and have been under extremely blistering temperatures, also undergo extremely major hunger that adversely influences and, in some cases, takes people’s lives. As far as I can tell, it is essential that governments enhance the quality of protective equipment so that the infrastructure can be protected against the destruction of nature. Besides, not only national and global humanitarian organizations but also the authorities should call for donations for these affected areas. This may not be a long-term solution, but I believe it would do those people some favors, at least aid in feeding them temporarily.
Briefly, the widespread deprivation of food has afflicted the majority of people living in underdeveloped nations, despite there being loads of breakthroughs in the agricultural sector. Its causes may be the lack of timely practices from the government and the negative effect of nature. What we could do to resolve the problem is the introduction of various sensible policies and modern defense facilities against the devastation of nature.
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much Why do people take part in dangerous sports Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers 73
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The Chalk Man Book response
- Topic What are the influences of the Internet on youth development 73
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ht not be as severe as it is. That the governments failure to address this problem and pos...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, briefly, but, if, may, so, therefore, as for, at least, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2383.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 445.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35505617978 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08145529687 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9772668546 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.15 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18214094778 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516985691698 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460513040829 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109899733911 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168072482457 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ht not be as severe as it is. That the governments failure to address this problem and pos...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, briefly, but, if, may, so, therefore, as for, at least, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2383.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 445.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35505617978 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08145529687 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9772668546 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.15 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18214094778 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516985691698 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460513040829 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109899733911 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168072482457 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.