While artificial intelligence becomes so advanced, people can use computers to translate foreign languages. Do you agree with it? Give examples or your experiences to support.
Recently, the phenomenon of advances in technology create new opportunities for people and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of Increase public access is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that do not use individual skills can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, increasing use of computers for translation can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of Decreased language learning, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of Fast translation. Thus, beneficial ramifications of Easier access are visible.
Within the realm of science, Translation by people is more efficient can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that the demerits of a closer look are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has described the role of full Information. Hence, predicted outcomes of the correct method of translation are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of for literary and scientific texts, translation by individuals is more correct far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of transmit emotions and accurate scientific information prove the significance of more fun reading, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-19 | پیام احدنژاد | 85 | view |
| 2021-04-12 | vahidmetall | 77 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61811023622 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25164675917 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641732283465 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5035335204 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.727272727 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169526161351 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507447307962 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461239509455 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898860096452 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281601150784 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61811023622 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25164675917 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641732283465 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5035335204 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.727272727 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169526161351 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507447307962 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461239509455 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898860096452 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281601150784 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.