The best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that raising the price of petrol is the most effective way to curb escalating pollution problems. In my opinion, though this measure would have a tangible impact, there are more acceptable ones.
On the one hand, more expensive fuel costs may cause a decrease in fuel demand for both individuals and companies, which brings about a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions. This can be seen in the way that the average people struggling to pay their bills every month might decide to switch from private vehicles to other modes of transport such as walking, riding a bicycle, and using public transportation. Companies using fossil fuel combustion in industrial activities also have motivation to use alternative materials for maximizing their profits. However, this method may bring little change as many other environmental problems like deforestation and land degradation are not closely correlated with fuel consumption, and thus could hardly be rectified by an increase in fuel prices.
On the other hand, I think that a better environment can be achieved by other more effective methods. Firstly, governments could implement more stringent environmental regulations on all aspect of life from overusing of pesticides and fertilizers to limiting greenhouse gase emision. In United State, for example, pesticide misuse is fined heavily, therefore this will make individuals and organizations more responsible in order to avoid future punishment. Secondly, by investing in green alternative energy sources such as solar, wind, and tidal power, human beings can lower their reliance on fuel. With the support of governments around the world, the innovation in energy has sparked a wave of electric vehicles as those means of transport are now expected to replace gas-powered ones altogether to slow climate change.
In conclusion, increasing petrol price can be an effective factor to reduce the consumption of fossil fuel. However, it is not the best way as developing renewable energy sources and enforcing environmental laws can be more helpful in most cases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-21 | thao.nt211 | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-19 | thaopham1705 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l activities also have motivation to use alternative materials for maximizing the...
^^
Line 3, column 720, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'those means'?
Suggestion: this means; those means
... sparked a wave of electric vehicles as those means of transport are now expected to replac...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 785, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...are now expected to replace gas-powered ones altogether to slow climate change. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, in most cases, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43384615385 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95390064052 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621538461538 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.4795502538 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.846153846 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2307692308 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15123488196 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491537401863 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448229568964 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892524043398 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538305783162 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.