Nowadays Internet access and public transportation are both essential parts of our society. With fluent Internet access, we can surf hundreds or thousands of websites in one click away, which give us more chance to know the world. And convenient transportation is also beneficial. People can travel in the city faster and save a lot of time. Thus, government should spend more money on which infrastructure is hotly debated. Some people believe that Internet access is more important. However, I disagree with this argument. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will elaborate on in the following passages.
First and foremost, public transportation will have a wider impact on our city. Even in this technology-advanced society, it's normal that some people, like the elderly or people in poverty, don't know how to use Internet or lack the necessary devices. But public transportation is widely used by almost all people in the city, especially those who enroll in low-wage jobs. If we spend more money to improve Internet access, the policy is only beneficial for people who have the money to access Internet. That will definitely widen socioeconomic inequities. Those most in need of a better life are not getting help. In contrast, if we put more money and attention to public transportation, the impact of this money has a wider reach.
Second, transportation is necessary to our daily life. We can endure time without the Internet and transfer to using other traditional media like newspapers or TV. We can still gain knowledge and absorb information around the world, though we may encounter some difficulties. In contrast, if we cannot access transportation, in a large metropolitan area like New York or London, it's hard for us to get anywhere easily and cheaply, which has a larger impact on our daily lives.
Admittedly, Internet access is important to some extent. It can broaden people's horizons or provide them with the latest news. It's necessary for government to spend money on it, but compare to the importance of public transportation, it couldn't be the priority.
To put it into a nutshell, public transportation has a wider impact and is more essential for people' lives, thus I believe that government should spend more money on public transportation instead on Internet.
- if universities are given financial support to develop researches which one do you think would receive more benefits a To predict weather more accurately b To clean rivers and ocean c To deal with outer space 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children should spend most of their time on studying and playing and they shouldn t be required to help family with household chores such as cleaning and cooking 88
- It is more beneficial for people to stop reading or listening to the news for a few days because there are too many news stories around the world 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The invention of the Internet has had negative effects on your civilization Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 75
- Some students prefer to study alone Others prefer to study with a group of students Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... like the elderly or people in poverty, dont know how to use Internet or lack the ne...
^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...importance of public transportation, it couldnt be the priority. To put it into a nuts...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, thus, i feel, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09788359788 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05054446051 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9659813338 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7826086957 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4347826087 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47826086957 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413912545284 0.236089414692 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110211380031 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119711505587 0.0737576698707 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252256758512 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102537736793 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... like the elderly or people in poverty, dont know how to use Internet or lack the ne...
^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...importance of public transportation, it couldnt be the priority. To put it into a nuts...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, thus, i feel, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09788359788 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05054446051 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9659813338 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7826086957 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4347826087 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47826086957 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413912545284 0.236089414692 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110211380031 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119711505587 0.0737576698707 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252256758512 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102537736793 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.