use of TED for saving of turtles
The article presents some critisim towards the use of the turtle excluder devices (TEDs) by shrimp-fishing boats to help prevent any dangers upon turtles caught in their nets. The lecturer contradicts points made in the article, and provides responses to each critisim.
Firstly, althogh it is true that the chances of a single shrimper trapping turtles is low, there are thousands of shrimp fishing boats out in the sea, so the chances of endangering the turtles overall accumulates and becomes considerable. Also, the impact of shrimp fishing on these endangered turtle populations is more important than losing profits by shrimpers.
Secondly, a time limit on keeping nets underwater might seem like a good idea in theory, however, it is not practical. This strategy would be diffucult to enforce since there are numerous shrimp fishing boats far in the sea. While government ships patroling the sea for time limits of net lowering is not a feasible idea, in the case of TEDs, the authorities would only have to check if the TED is installed in the nets before departure at the bay.
Finally, the design of TEDs can be modified easily to be properly fit in areas where are the habitats of bigger turtles, and therefore making them efficient even for larger species.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-04-27 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 81 | view |
2020-07-26 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
- TPO 16 Integrated the archaeology science is in danger in Britain because of three reasons many artifacts were lost in construction projects many professionals feel that financial support for their research is inadequate it is difficult to have a career i 80
- TPO 21 independent agree or not for success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 76
- TPO 51 independent agree or not movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 88
- little time spent on play or schoolwork 81
- hail fall and cloud seeding 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01886792453 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66679274652 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665094339623 0.540411800872 123% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3492940555 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06452816374 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218489998562 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744994445568 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744911873955 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115003341517 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470685276487 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01886792453 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66679274652 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665094339623 0.540411800872 123% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3492940555 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06452816374 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218489998562 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744994445568 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744911873955 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115003341517 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470685276487 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.