The table illustrates the amount of budget spent on three disparate goods and services which are food, drinks and tobacco, clothing and footwear and leisure and education in five nations including Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in the year 2002. The unit is measured in percentage.
Overall, it is evident that all the surveyed regions used the greatest expenditure/ allocation for food, drinks and tobacco and the least one for leisure and education in the given year. In addition, it was Turkey that allocated the largest sum of money for these categories compared to others.
As can be seen from the table, in terms of food, drinks and tobacco, the figure for Turkey was over 32%, doubling that of Sweden which was approximately 16%. It is noticeable that the five mentioned countries used less than 5% of their money in total for leisure and education, especially Spain with just 1.98%.
Moreover, In 2002, Turkey was the most generous consumer, spending over 43% of their money on the three given kinds of products. Besides, both Italy and Spain shared virtually identical figures, with 28,56% and 27,29% respectively. Furthermore, the second biggest spender was Ireland with 37,46% and the most modest number, 24,39% of expenditure in the aggregate, was recorded for Sweden.
- Consumption of Fast Food by Australian teenagers 56
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 67
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 73
- Some people believe that school children should be made to wear a uniform Others feel that children should be free to choose their own clothes do you agree or disagree with pupils wearing uniforms 78
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, moreover, second, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16113744076 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57927040746 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587677725118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4619573562 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0609067483676 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250512868981 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356688707179 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0400546016556 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285186419309 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.