The line graph illustrates how people in a particular European country expended money on various commodities over an interval of 40 years, starting from 1960.
Overall, the percentage of spending on transport decreased significantly from 1960 to 2000. By contrast, the opposite trend was true for the others. Looking at the graph, it could be clearly seen that food was the most consumable for the majority of the time while fuel/energy consumption was the lowest.
Food spending hit its peak of just under 35%, which was nearly double that of leisure (just below 20%), and far exceeded the figures for other aspects namely clothing (10%), and fuel/energy (6%) in 1960. There was a downward trend in the proportion of expenditure on food, leisure, clothing, and fuel/energy between 1960 and 2000. At the end of the period, the expenditure on food recorded a precipitous decline, accounting for less than 14%. In addition, the figures for leisure, clothing, and fuel/energy all went down consistently to their lowest points, amounting to just over 10%, 5%, and approximately 3% in turn in 2000.
About 9% of the European budget was allocated for transportation in 1960. The period 1960-2000 witnessed an enormous increase in the percentage of spending on transport. This figure enjoyed a steady upswing to reach a high of 15% in 2000.
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 89
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11946902655 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87630019768 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601769911504 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3648205347 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.181818182 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231230998571 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897964258281 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817296703467 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144062742309 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063119291665 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.