Making projects that required collaboration between students is considered an efficient way for students to absorb knowledge. From my perspective, I firmly disagree that, this is an effective method for students to become better. I feel this way for two reasons and I will elaborate on my viewpoint in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the project involves multiple people can make communication less efficient and difficult. Obviously, more people equals more opinions, and execution containing overwhelming advice will have trouble because the members within are likely to disagree and argue with other participants and delay the process compared to the work that determines by a person that does not have to engage with others. For instance, when I was in college, collaborating with strangers is essential during lessons. During the first group session, individuals from different backgrounds contain a variety of perceptions which leads the conversation very inefficient the reason is that everyone trying to deliver their own thoughts and none of them have the patience to understand or listen. Consequently, the result of the project is terrible, and poor communication has a direct impact on the failure.
Moreover, students with better grades have to participate with those who have lower grades can affect the results. Evidently, students with higher grades normally have significant ideas or methods to achieve better scores and goals when it comes to schoolwork. As the combination goes on, students with better thoughts have to associate with those who might not understand the idea and even occur conflict in the process. To illustrate, during the workshop I participated in when I was in college we were asked to produce a short film to persuade the audience of a particular message. A student who majored in filmmaking was in our group, however, he have to spend numerous of time explaining the reason and purpose of the sequence and valuable time had been wasted in the process even though he is a professional filmmaker. As the result, people with better scores will be painful when cooperating with those who have no clue what is happening.
From what has been discussed above, we can safely draw a conclusion that a collective project is a terrible way to approach learning.
- TPO 39 Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO 43 integrated writing 75
- TPO11Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 70
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ilmmaking was in our group, however, he have to spend numerous of time explaining th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, i feel, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23180592992 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93286971698 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3435225092 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.4 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7333333333 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192438081367 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674187454346 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309697613292 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10405776835 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370320835106 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.