The chart compares different percentages of American people eating junk food, categorized by how often they consumed it in the three years of 2003, 2006 and 2013.
Overall, the percentage of people who ate fast food once a week and once or twice a month was the highest in the mentioned years, while the smallest figure went to those who ate it every day and never tried one. It is also apparent that there was an increase in the rate of people who consumed junk food once or twice a month and a few times a year whereas the remaining all decreased.
Regarding the chart of once a week consumers, the figure started at 31% in 2003 then went up slightly to 34% 3 years later, which became the highest pre percentage in that year, before falling to 28% in 2013. As opposed to the pattern of people who ate junk food once or twice a week which witnessed a decline in the middle year from 30% to 25%, then rose to 34% in 2013.
The percentage of people who ate out several times a week was 18% in 2005 then reached the peak at 20% before falling to 16% at the end. 13% was the original figure of people who had junk food a few times a year then it remained unchanged in the 2 surveyed years at 15%. A similar pattern can be seen in the case of people who ate it everyday and those who never had once, starting at 4% and 5% in 2003 and stayed at 3% and 4% respectively in the two other years.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Write a report 56
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that it is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The tables give the information on the temperatures and the hours of daylight at the same weekend in May in 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant Mumbai India 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 89
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 335, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e seen in the case of people who ate it everyday and those who never had once, starting ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.17407407407 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22815565897 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477777777778 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.9170087044 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.875 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.75 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197983831042 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105169956474 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538564105117 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146845676322 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488276714292 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.5 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.