The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparion where relevant.
The given table compares the proportion of money that buyers paid for five different goods in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in the year 2002.
It is clear that food/drinks/tobacco were the highest proportion while clothing/foodwear and leisure/education were the lowest percentage. Turkey was the country that buy the most items.
Food/drinks/tabacco were the most bought in Turkey with 32.14%, followed by Ireland with 28.91%, almost 3% lower than Turkey. The proportion in Spain was higher than the percentage in Italy with 18.08% and 16.36% respectively. The number of this item in Sweden was the lowest, almost 17% lower than the highest percentage.
Italy was the country that bought the most clothing and footwear accounted for 9%, higher than the country ranked 2 was that Turkey at 6.63%. The difference between Spain and Ireland was not quiet big, took up 6.51% and 6.43% respectively while the proportion of Sweden was the lowest comprised 5.40%. Leisure and education were the fields of least interest, the highest figure went to Turkey at 4.35% whilst Spain was the country that used this items least with 1.98%, other figures in this fields were quiet even.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2022-08-03 | rachell | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | nhattram39 | 11 | view |
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries in 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 31
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- Some people think international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution however others think there are some other ways Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 340, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the least'.
Suggestion: of the least
.... Leisure and education were the fields of least interest, the highest figure went to Tu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 487, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...tems least with 1.98%, other figures in this fields were quiet even.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.171875 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90760776975 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520833333333 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0176732183 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0730360798732 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366507332333 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388949702132 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0572664064297 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476681328611 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.