The table below shows the percentages of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparion where relevant.
The given table compares the figures of users who use six mobile phone features from 2006 to 2010.
It is clear that almost features increased over the period shown, except for make calls and play games decreased in those years. Make calls was the highest proportion in six features whilst record videos was the lowest.
In 2006 and 2008, make calls was the highest percentage with 100%, followed by send& recieve text messages at 73% and 75% respectively, almost 30% lower than make calls feature. In next year, make calls decreased 1% while send& recieve text messages increased 4% but this change did not affect the difference when make calls was still higher than send& recieve text messages accounted for 99% and 79% respectively.
Take photos ranked in third comprised 66%, 71% and 76% respectively, this figure was quiet similar to make calls. Play games was in no.4 with 41% in the last year and 17% in the first year, quiet higher than the rest. Although there was no data in 2006, search the internet was still higher than other figures with 41% and 73% respectively in 2008 and 2010. The percentage of play music was higher than the figure that of record videos took up total 56% and 44% respectively in three years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-29 | Taytor2609 | 73 | view |
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things What is your opinion 74
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 60
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two contries on consumer goods in 2010 pounds sterlng 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, still, third, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7523364486 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26382940482 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546728971963 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.385723316 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115512416663 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061710731239 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755793568107 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107978485933 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931718308893 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, still, third, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7523364486 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26382940482 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546728971963 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.385723316 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115512416663 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061710731239 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755793568107 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107978485933 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931718308893 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.