The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014
The given maps illustrate how the waterside area of a town named Darwin has changed from 2009 to 2014.
Overall, the northern scene significantly changed with the construction of the replacement of the industrial area including residential, recreational and academic amenities in the period of 15 years starting from 2009. The change in the given period consisted of the development of transport infrastructure in the southern area as well.
North of the map, the region on the left of the lake in 2009 which used to be covered by an industrial zone turned into a swimming pool in 2014. In addition, more buildings located in the residential area and a university building nearby were built in 2014. However, there was no change with the convention center, school and two large swimming pools between 2009 and 2014.
To the south, the major area which was surrounded by an industrial section in 2009 was obliterated after 5 years to make room for a large green space with a lot of trees. Moreover, there was a new harbour on the seashore and a footpath connecting the harbour with the west main road of the town from 2009 to 2014.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | ThHuong | 87 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 78 | view |
- Some people argue that because the Internet makes it so easy for children to access facts schools should not focus on teaching facts Instead they should focus on developing children s skills and potential and their relationships with other people To what 78
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 56
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Human are damaging the environment What are the reasons What can the government do to address these problems What can individual people do 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given maps illustrate how the waterside area of a town named Darwin ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82653061224 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78319015494 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545918367347 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9006876675 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2587767284 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121608920017 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080683596943 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178927776072 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886932479871 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.