For the development of a country, it's more important to spend money on education of very young children（5-10years）than to spend on universities.
education is always one of the key point in the context of a country's development. As we all known, childhood is a very important period in the development of values and learning methods. Hence, there exists an argument that a government should spend more money on the education of young children than it on university. however, from my own perspective, this idea does not make sense.
First of all, university time is also essential for teenagers because it is the period that they will learn a great deal of specialist knowledge in preparation for future research or hunting jobs. Therefore, the government needs to provide adequate resources, such as hiring highly qualified professors, establishing laboratories and providing subsidies for employment start-ups and these are extremely costly. So it is reasonable and necessary for government to support funding to university.
Secondly, education in the childhood is of great importance, but it doesn't mean a lot of money is needed to support it. The educational approach is more important in this period than the financial support. Rather than providing money, what the government should do is to promote the right kind of education, for example, not to put too much pressure on children and to promote the development of all-round qualities. On the other hand, university education is not the same, financial support is the basis for scientific research or innovation and entrepreneurship.
Last but not the least, spending money on university education is more efficient and faster gains can be achieved. For university students, this is an achievable goal within a few years, whether they choose to continue their scientific studies or to seek employment in society. this means that within a few years, the government's investment in university education could see a return. however, this is not the case for investment in education during childhood, as it is clear that it takes more time for children to grow up and give back to society . Then if the government wants immediate gains, all the more reason to spend on university education.
As a conclusion, from three perspectives, all the more reason for the government to spend money on university education. because university is a very important period for people to achieve success and the need for financial support is even greater, and investing in university education is more efficient than childhood education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-09 | sustechjam | 66 | view |
- for a successful developement of a country it is more important for the government to spend money on education of very young children than to spend money on universities 66
- For the development of a country it s more important to spend money on education of very young children 5 10years than to spend on universities 66
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight How far do you agree with either of these views 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
education is always one of the key point...
^^
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Education
education is always one of the key point in the c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...f young children than it on university. however, from my own perspective, this idea doe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt funding to university. Secondly, education in the childhood is of great i...
^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hildhood is of great importance, but it doesnt mean a lot of money is needed to suppor...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 279, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...udies or to seek employment in society. this means that within a few years, the gove...
^^^^
Line 10, column 319, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...this means that within a few years, the governments investment in university education coul...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 386, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...niversity education could see a return. however, this is not the case for investment in...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 549, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...dren to grow up and give back to society . Then if the government wants immediate ...
^^
Line 13, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...to spend money on university education. because university is a very important period f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.0752688172 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26342710997 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04558504996 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49104859335 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0333805811 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7222222222 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439281715495 0.236089414692 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139502518119 0.076458572812 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947954522654 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261798785633 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100222185433 0.0645574589148 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.