The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
The first pie chart compares how much energy is used to operate households in Australia. The second pie chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions of Australian households.
Overall, there were dramatic differences in the shares of heating, refrigeration, lighting, and other appliances, while the similarities were seen in the figure for cooling and water heating. In addition, the percentages of water heating and cooling in using energy and releasing gas relatively being highest and lowest.
Heating required the highest percent of energy, the figures for refrigeration, lighting, and other appliances were lower, at 42%, 7%, 4%, and 15% respectively. Their figure in releasing gas emissions saw significant differences. While lighting accounted for 8% of gas emissions, refrigeration brought about 14% of emissions. The figure for other appliances far exceeded that of heating, with the respective percentages being 28% and 15%
Water heating accounted for 30% of energy to be used, as opposed to cooling using 2% of energy. Similarities can be seen in the figure for their gas emissions, water heating accounted for 32% of Australian households' gas emissions while cooling discarded just 3% of gas emissions.
- The line graphs of five different communication services worldwide 61
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should s 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...respective percentages being 28% and 15% Water heating accounted for 30% of energ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51851851852 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09731310179 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0849603579 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.888888889 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226500639957 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123389830929 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126807457249 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18695737288 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182539993961 0.0819641961636 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.