The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph aims to highlight how many explorers stopped by a particular Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the was a significant increase in the total number of visitors traveling to the Caribbean island in the years examined, which was the result of rises in the group of travelers staying on cruise ships and staying on the island. In addition, the number of visitors who stayed on cruise ships saw dramatic growth, surpassing the number of sightseers who stayed on the island to have the highest figure from 2015 onwards.
The total number of tourists traveling to the Caribbean island started at 1 million visitors, after which it experienced growth to the north of 2.5 million visitors in 2015, before ending the period at its peak (3.5 million visitors). The figure for the number of travelers staying on the island was approximately 0.75 million travelers in 2010, followed by stability at this point until 2011, before reaching 1.25 million visitors in 2012. Opposite changes can be seen in the figure for a group of explorers staying on cruise ships, which increased to 0.5 million explorers in 2011 (from around 0.25 million travelers in 2010), then decreased to just under 0.25 million visitors in 2012.
About 1.5 million visitors stayed on the island from 2013 to 2015, with a subsequent decline to around 1.3 million visitors in 2016, and a final increase to 1.5 million visitors in 2017. By contrast, the figure for a group of people staying on cruise ships increased dramatically from 0.5 million visitors in 2013 to about 1.5 million visitors in 2015 and surpassed the number of people staying on the island, reaching a peak of 2 million travelers in 2017.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | RIYA MODI | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | dhphuc7866 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | rumpul4skin | view | |
| 2023-08-15 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | NgoMinhTriet | 84 | view |
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- It is sometimes said that people should be encouraged to get married before they are 30 as this is best both for individual and society do you agree or disagree 67
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 56
- some people say that advertising is extremely successfully at persuading us to buy things Other people think that adversingingis so common hat e no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opininon 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 33.7804878049 210% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91258741259 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5515373413 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.409090909091 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7322369888 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.625 112.824112599 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.75 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112319870112 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07648323251 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541139611383 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105331558465 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618749812679 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.