The given pie charts compare the amount of electricity produced by five different sources in Australia and France in two separated years.
Overall, while their total productions rose significantly from 1980 to 2000, there was a considerable decrease witnessed in the figures for natural gas of both countries.
In detail, coal was the most commonly used material to produce electricity in Australia, with 50 units in 1980 and increasing to 130 units in 2000. In addition, in 1980, 20 units of electricity in Australia were generated by using natural gas, doubling the figure for oil. Nonetheless, these figures dropped to two units each in the year 2000. It is noticeable that Australia did not consider nuclear power as a source of producing electricity.
In France, in 1980, each fuel source was used to produce under 30 units of electricity, and the lowest number was recorded for hydro power, with only five units. Moreover, while there was a surge of over 100 units in electricity in France by nuclear power, those by natural gas dipped from 20 units to two units in two years.
- The diagram shows the process for labelling shellfish for the international market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 61
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 73
- Some people think that robots are very important for human s future development Others however think that robots are a dangerous invention that could have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nonetheless, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93442622951 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74631348351 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562841530055 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3959874059 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236590407334 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114493638256 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423596006865 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151902654935 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507809911678 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.