It is true that the number of people who suffer from obesity is increasing recently. Although there are several reasons for this phenomenon, some steps could be taken to tackle this problem.
The increase in the number of obese people is derived from different factors. Firstly, instant foods are considered to be the key driver of this. To be more specific, because of hectic life, these kinds of food are a prevalent option for people with strict schedules. However, they are likely to be rich in harmful fats which contribute to consumers’ corpulence if they are unable to manage their caloric intake. Additionally, being overweight might be attributed to the innovation of technology. To illustrate, if humans are over-reliant on sophisticated labor-saving devices, a sedentary lifestyle will be created. Consequently, their metabolism, the process of converting consumed food into energy, becomes ineffective, gradually leading to unexpected weight gain.
Nonetheless, both individuals and local governments can take actions to address the aforementioned issues. One of the most practical is balanced regiments. For example, plant-based diets are recommended for obese patients as they can improve metabolism. Moreover, effective physical activities such as jogging, bicycling and swimming can also help to burn calories and drop pounds. Hence, the risk of being fat is reduced, and people can meet their physical fitness goal more easily. Another feasible solution is that local councils should encourage their residents to exercise more frequently by establishing public playgrounds with workout equipment.
In conclusion, increasing corpulence is caused by unhealthy food and negative effects of technological inventions. However, various measures including proper eating plans and workouts can be taken to solve the epidemic.
- Consumption of Fast Food by Australian teenagers 56
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 89
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73722627737 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0698963196 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667883211679 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8188301205 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4705882353 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1176470588 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203746630549 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595220834889 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515140622498 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12488809834 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265173241898 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.