The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008.
The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008.
As can be seen, the medical centre experienced a dramatic transformation with the addition of an education room, mother and child room, pharmacy and store room.
In 2008, there was still a small medical centre with a limited number of rooms but it was expanded in the next 2 years. In comparison with the medical centre in 2008, most of the rooms stayed unchanged and other new rooms were added to the medical centre in 2010. Three doctor’s office rooms on the top of the medical centre were downsized to construct another doctor’s office room and a store room. On the east-south of the medical centre, a new pharmacy was erected.
With a reference to the bottom left hand-corner of the medical centre, the mother and child room was constructed and on the north of it, an education room was also built in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-24 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 73
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...it was expanded in the next 2 years. In comparison with the medical centre in 2008, most o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 764.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.775 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62190293489 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49375 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2321009389 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326750249296 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226766831997 0.103423049105 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.320798181981 0.0843802449381 380% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326083286384 0.15604864568 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.392129309094 0.0819641961636 478% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.