The given diagrams illustrate the changes to a medical centre between 2008 and 2010. It is noticeable that the centre experienced a remarkable transformation with the introduction of five new rooms used for different purposes.
In 2008, treatment room was in the northwest corner of the building and three doctor’s offices were located to the east of the treatment room. By 2010, those doctor’s offices had been reduced in size and an additional one had been added. Also, a new store room had been built in the northeast corner of the centre.
In the area to the south of the treatment room, a new education room and mother and child room had been developed. The waiting room, which could be accessed from the main entrance, remained unchanged in size and position. Likewise, the staff office, the reception and the laboratory experienced no changes over the period. The only change taking place in the southeast corner of the medical facility was the erection of a new pharmacy to the north of the existing laboratory.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 73
- Some people give more importance to artists painter writers musicians in the current age of rapidly developing technology and science What do you think Do people prefer arts to technology in your view 78
- The diagram shows how tea leaves are processed into five tea types Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The line graph below shows the monthly ridership of four separate transportation forms in a European metropolitan area between 1980 and 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant Write at 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: unchanged
...cessed from the main entrance, remained unchanged in size and position. Likewise, the staff offic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94219653179 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73757860099 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7816089107 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133781431687 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724543352759 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122454438935 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118366371317 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10044064368 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.