The bar chart gives information about the food loss and waste at the different stages of production in developed and developing countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.
The bar chart shows the percentage of losing and wasting foods in different manufacturing groups in industrialized and developing nations.
The most important losses in developed countries are in consumption and sales, which have the same features as the total food loss and waste. The significant contribution to excess food in the LEDCs is post-harvesting and harvesting.
In consumption and sales, twenty percent of food is wasted and lost more in developed countries, and the total food loss and waste than in developing countries. The amount of food loss, and waste used, and turnover in developing countries is the same, at 7%.
In contrast, the poor only waste the most food post-harvesting and harvesting, which is nearly the same at about 15%, while the wealthy nation had a moderate change in these seasons. Only twice the amount of food is wasted and lost more in the total than in developed countries
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm 78
- Cam 17 test 3 The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their wekkly income in 1968 abd in 2018
- The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000 The total budget was ADE 135 billion
- The diagram shows changes in Felistone in the UL between 1967 and 2001 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tures as the total food loss and waste. The significant contribution to excess food...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11920529801 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98549921473 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496688741722 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1403939971 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.428571429 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315032403203 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169526802283 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763442832123 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210819006062 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500669514889 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.