Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, technology has become the part and parcel of our life. By emerging this, some individuals think that traditional newspapers and magazines will be replaced by E-books and modern technology. To some extent it is true, but I do believe that paper books cannot be replaced by online sources.
To commence with, getting knowledge on Internet has become a trend because of its convenience. At moment, information can be accessed by citizens and they can come across through all happenings, which are going on in the world. For instance, kindle and Daily News apps are available on the Internet in which citizens can search for the latest news and books, and they may enhance their knowledge. So, they do not need to carry books and newspapers in their bags in the presence of technological gadgets.
However, reading long hours of paper books can be more helpful than online sources, because reading on screen may affect the eyesight of a person. For instance, if a person reads offline content, he may develop better reading skills without any health issues like poor eyesight. In addition to it, there are so many remote areas in the world where accessing the internet is not possible; as a result, paper books and newspapers are the only sources of information.
To conclude, despite all benefits of technological sources of knowledge, I believe, they cannot replace traditional newspapers and books.
- Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European county between 1979 and 2004
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, for instance, in addition, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07296137339 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7270617271 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609442060086 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9216450188 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.454545455 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161387298734 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071216061693 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900853011229 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123205501965 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10931033275 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.