More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Since the commencement of the flourishing technology era, lots of adults give their children the permission to utilize electronic devices as relaxation, in order for them to acquire technological knowledge. From a personal perspective, the writer deems that there are many demerits, notwithstanding the merits.
Discussing the advantages, it is undeniable that children will gain a plethora of benefits thanks to their computing skills. Technology is indispensable for future global citizens’ further development, and schooling barely provides enough chances for the transition of theories to hands-on experience. By early exposure to equipment like computers or tablets, youngsters are liable to practice and improve their ability; hence, being proficient in IT and obtaining requisite qualifications. As any enterprise requires upper-intermediate to advanced capability of computer use, this assists them in job applications, which may give them a lucrative occupation in the future.
Turning to the other side of the argument, these following disadvantages should not be neglected. First and foremost, children’s attitudes may be affected by online platforms’ toxic content. They are so immature and innocent that there is scarcely any possibility to differentiate between friendly and unfriendly entertaining materials. As a result, this leads to inevitable absorption of awful behaviors, since some games and videos actually increase repulsive thoughts and actions in the young. Moreover, early approaches to IT gadgets bring about deteriorations of mental and physical wellbeings. Some studies have shown that juveniles using computers from an early age tend to suffer from Internet addiction, resulting in self-isolation and illusion. In addition, scientists have cited several diseases on people using those devices since childhood, including sight disorders and dementia. As a matter of fact, lots of small children induce different eye issues and have to wear glasses. Much as youngsters excel in technology, they have few opportunitíes to develop further without a healthy overall status.
In brief, the writer would like to emphasize that the argument’s drawbacks far outshadow the potential benefits. Therefore, parents need to warn their children about these flaws of digital use and strictly supervise their usage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-05 | Pham Van Nhan | 84 | view |
- More and more people no longer read newspaper or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 89
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in brief, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88563049853 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25611197633 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656891495601 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8105102849 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.058823529 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181890667992 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484914770575 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437554430546 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104156767861 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0060499621856 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.