With the development of industry, consuming more fossil fuels, and producing more greenhouse gas, environmental problems like climate change are becoming severe, influencing the survival of humans and animals. Therefore, for the sustainable development of the earth, we have to take action to protect the natural environment. It’s accustomed to learning that individuals are frequently trapped in continual conflicts with inner contradictions, thus it is reasonable that quite a few citizens endorse that it is more effective to recycle and reuse objects, while others prefer to buy organic foods grown without pesticides. I, however, personally hold the counterargument that walking or bicycling instead of driving a car to work or school is a better approach instead.
First and foremost, I have noticed that it is persuasive to lend credence to the idea that walking and bicycling benefit personal development because it’s conducive to improving physical health and saving more money. Most individuals, especially those who work in the “996” schedule, don’t have enough time to exercise. Walking or bicycling to work not only can save their time, but also strengthen physical health. It is the same for the student. Based on this point, I remember when I was in high school, I would bicycle to school every day; and during that time, I kept in good health though there was a lot of studying pressure. Besides, as we know, money spent on commuting makes a large part of the daily expenses, partly because of the high price of gas oil. If people walk or bicycle to work, they will save a great amount of money which can be used to promote their life quality by traveling and entertaining. Consequently, the claim that walking and bicycling benefit personal development is justified.
Another vehicle to my perspective is that recycling and reusing objects or buying organic food might cause plenty of undesirable side effects, although they are helpful to some extent. On the one hand, protecting the environment for individuals doesn’t mean we should give up the convenience of daily life. Reused objects are usually unsuitable for further using and recycling always spend a lot of extra time. If you throw them in the trash can, there will be better categorized and recycled by the specific company. On the other hand, locally grown, organic foods are usually expensive due to the higher cost and fewer supplies. Not all individuals can afford them and they can’t fulfill the large demand in quantity. Accordingly, there is little doubt that both reusing objects and buying organic foods are not completely useful in our daily life.
To sum up, frankly, sometimes it is really hard to tell whether my opinion outweighs one of the others, especially given the complicated situation describe above. However, after weighty consideration, I deeply believe the conclusion that walking and bicycling are more environmentally friendly than recycling and reusing objects and buying organic food for individuals.
- Are governments doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of food nutrition and healthy eating 71
- Many students starting university must choose a major and parents of these students often give them advice about which major to choose Some parents tell their children to choose the major that most interests the students other parents tell students that i 78
- Robert E Peary was a well known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole When he returned from the expedition he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7 1909 This report made him into an international celebrity Though 81
- Some people prefer to attend that the fairly small class sizes while others prefer to attend large institutions that have more lecture style classes with a hundred of students 76
- Is job sharing good for workers Job sharing is a type of part time employment in which one position can be shared by two part time workers that is the two people share the work hours and pay of one job Job sharing opens more opportunities to people who ha 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, consequently, first, frankly, however, if, really, so, then, therefore, thus, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2548.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26446280992 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86441142481 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576446280992 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 792.0 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1432142846 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0476190476 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95238095238 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201743995847 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575425744231 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517395141533 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104414016444 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285411678672 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, consequently, first, frankly, however, if, really, so, then, therefore, thus, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2548.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26446280992 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86441142481 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576446280992 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 792.0 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1432142846 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0476190476 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95238095238 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201743995847 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575425744231 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517395141533 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104414016444 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285411678672 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.