In recent times one of the most debated issues relates to life styles of human being. Some people assert that people, who survive in 21st century enjoy high standard of life in relation with those who took birth in previous era. However, I strongly believe that up to some extent people enjoy better life in 21st century, but 19th century also had certain good facts, which made life more qualitative.
Bolstering my view, I would like to highlight my reasons as follows. Firstly, technological development play immense role to make person's life easy and comfortable in current era. To exemplify, nowadays people can easily connect with their relatives and colleagues with phones, social-media, and use many more technological devices. Secondly, thanks to the transportation development, which play vital role to available small to bigger things in every corner of the world. To explain in details, people can enjoy chocolate, which manufacture in Switzerland in every part of the globe.
However, the alternative argument is that the lifestyle of previous era was more enjoyable. To elaborate, in 19th century, people were prefer to live in joint family, which was important for younger generation to learn customs and traditions from their older ones. Further, citizens shared their time with their family members rather than spending time on social-media, which were help them to build strong relationship among family members.
To conclude, I would once again clarify that 21st century definitely make our life comfortable and enjoyable, but 19th century also helped to learn how to share things with others.
- The Diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 84
- Most of our information comes from the Internet nowadays Some people say that a large part of the information we get is incorrect Do you agree or disagree 11
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 55
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... learn how to share things with others.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31128404669 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72044270123 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610894941634 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5096283936 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198565077294 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658873220508 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700807157515 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121877954151 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735722460559 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.