"All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems."
The speaker asserts that all nations should help develop a global university aiming at engaging students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems.
Imagine all countries around the world working together to build a university where young students get inspired to make the world a better place and even being a part of such effort. This is an idea that almost sounds too good to be true, but I must point out that this is unrealistic and would contribute little to solving social issues.
First and foremost, it would be next to impossible to coordinate all countries in the world in establishing a university. A lot of countries in the world are hostile to one another and it would be unrealistic to exclude politics from this multinational campus. For example, the Moscow Olympics in the 1980s was boycotted by many western countries including the United States, mostly because of the cold war and that the Soviet Union shot down a Korean passenger flight which flew dangerously close to its military bases, killing hundreds of civilians on board. Political tensions constantly emrerge in many parts of the world, and countries might pull off from this World University or use their fundings as a leverage when tensions arrise.
Secondly, even if we live in a magical world where countries are very friendly to one another, establishing such a university would not contribute much to solving social issues. Scientists, researchers, and university professors all around the world are working on social issues like gender inequalities, crime, economic problems, etc. If some students are interested in solving these issues, they can approach these professionals and become research assistants or their phd students. If students and researchers are interested in issues happening in another part of the world, there is nothing that stops them from going there and conduct field research. Building a global university would therefore be unnecessary and a bad allocation of money and resources.
In sum, asking all nations to jointly develop a global university that aims to engage students in solving persistent social problems would be unrealistic and unnecessary. Such a university, if established, would be affected by political tensions among countries. Moreover, the existing universities are more than enough to inspire students and let them explore in the fields of research they are interested in.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-20 | Tendo407 | 83 | view |
| 2021-08-24 | Jatin Chaudhari | 50 | view |
| 2021-01-28 | Sudan Devkota | 66 | view |
| 2020-08-30 | Shreyan36 | 66 | view |
| 2020-08-07 | afeezbadmus767@ | 66 | view |
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer 75
- The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the 78
- It is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public 58
- The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records 58
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28020565553 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86848224732 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542416452442 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5268418994 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.933333333 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9333333333 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364201281722 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132042528298 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170101707982 0.0758088955206 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268272145237 0.150359130593 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.204838669031 0.0667264976115 307% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28020565553 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86848224732 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542416452442 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5268418994 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.933333333 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9333333333 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364201281722 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132042528298 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170101707982 0.0758088955206 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268272145237 0.150359130593 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.204838669031 0.0667264976115 307% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.