Living in large cities today poses many problems for people.
What are these problems? Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns?
These days majority of people have migrated from tiny villages to metropolises to have adequate living standards, which results in a plethora of troubles such as overabundance, congestion, stress, and pollution. In my opinion, the authorities should take measures to address the difficulties by making life outside the metro - cities attractive.
There is a wide range of drawbacks related to the rise of metropolis on the contrary the most obvious issues are congestion and pollution. Owing to the fact that society have difficulties in taking a job in bucolic areas, they migrate to the large cities. In addition, the city has consequently numerous amenities such as a job with a high salary, a large market to open a business, etc. These put a tremendous strain on metropolises. They might face overloading and a number of inhabitants can be out of work. The infrastructures might also be destroyed and not be abundance to provide for community. Most municipalities have become concrete jungles with minimum greenery. For instance, in Mumbai, abundance of people live in slums due to a lack of affordable housing, like Beijing in China, have become severely polluted.
In my opinion, the governments should take action to cure those problems by encouraging the citizens not to move to large cities abundantly. They also ought to improve infrastructure, and sanitation, and open more hospitals to cure patients in the pastoral area. In addition, they might support rural people to have a job, adequate housing, and connect to electricity fluently. Otherwise, the governments had a duty to do those, and the unabated expansion could keep going.
To sum up, the concerns related to overcrowding in cities can and should be somewhat countered by the government encouraging to live in rural areas. If we addressed the problem of overcrowding as in the near future as possible, we could face fewer problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-21 | hachi-0903 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | hachi-0903 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | hachi-0903 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | hachi-0903 | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-30 | ACHYUTHANWESH VANGA | 73 | view |
- Living in large cities today poses many problems for people What are these problems Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns 78
- Living in large cities today poses many problems for people What are these problems Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns 78
- Living in large cities today poses many problems for people What are these problems Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns 78
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Living in large cities today poses many problems for people What are these problems Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
These days majority of people have migrated from t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'living'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: living
...countered by the government encouraging to live in rural areas. If we addressed the pro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, for instance, in addition, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19093851133 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10997856928 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569579288026 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4764509392 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244527489477 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644752909 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621231841325 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143609992146 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027954028216 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.