All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
As per my opinion, Companies should spend more money and time listening to their own employees to get valuable suggestions because own existing employees of the companies are well aware of the organization structure of their company, their Company's roadmap for the particular time period and probable threats or obstacles during this journey that they might face to achieve the desired results and operate in more efficient and organized manner, thus I am completely agree with the mentioned issue.
Nowadays, Companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently which results in additional efforts to the hiring team to hire such consultants for only specific time period and also it will affect company financially as these consultants demands more money for a short span of time as compared to the existing employees of the company. In addition to this, all these outside consultants are not much concerned and dedicated about their decisions and work as they are already aware that they are contributing and working for a limited period for the company, and thus I feel existing employees are more concered and dedicated towards their work as compared to outside consultants.
Above explaination might not hold true if the company's own employees doesn't want to take any additional responsibilities and invest their time to think and suggest ways for the company to operate efficiently. In that case, Companies has to hire outside consultants for this work and invest time, more money and energy into these outside consultants.
So to conclude this issue, as I mentioned in above paragraphs, I am agree with the issue topic that companies should spend more time listening to their own employees if they are ready to work instead of hiring outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently.
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 468, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
... organized manner, thus I am completely agree with the mentioned issue. Nowaday...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etely agree with the mentioned issue. Nowadays, Companies hire outside consult...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rk as compared to outside consultants. Above explaination might not hold true i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hold true if the companys own employees doesnt want to take any additional responsibil...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nergy into these outside consultants. So to conclude this issue, as I mentione...
^^^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...s I mentioned in above paragraphs, I am agree with the issue topic that companies sho...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, as to, i feel, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 302.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18543046358 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79647475239 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 215.323595506 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440397350993 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 50.0 23.0359550562 217% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 115.919033046 60.3974514979 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 261.0 118.986275619 219% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 50.3333333333 23.4991977007 214% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.21951772744 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.579515848137 0.243740707755 238% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.347790026525 0.0831039109588 419% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114791740798 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.419697718409 0.150359130593 279% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417553817896 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.2 14.1392134831 199% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 12.27 48.8420337079 25% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.0 12.1743820225 197% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.71 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.8971910112 240% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 22.0 11.2143820225 196% => OK
text_standard: 29.0 11.7820224719 246% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.