Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is considered by some that specialists who worked in vocations including medicine and engineering are obliged to dedicate themselves to where they did their initial training. However, I am of the opinion that all individuals ought to have the freedom to choose their country of occupation.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some believe that professionals have to work where their education was provided. The first reason is that qualified professionals, especially those who are medical practitioners and engineers at some point likely rely deeply on governmental and educational resources in the local area. It is therefore understandable why the residents expect these experts to remain in the same country and repay the society that assisted them. Another reason is that the migration of professionals to more developed countries could result in a huge a huge drain brain and have detrimental effects on a country’s economy. For example, a plethora of Indian doctors often apply for citizenship in the USA; thus, India is facing a huge deficiency of expert doctors, and the migration is slowing the economy of this developing country also.
On the other hand, I would argue that it should be professionals who make the choice as to their place of employment. The key consideration is these people devote years of their lives to studying and contributing to society; therefore, it is not selfish of them to move overseas for a higher income or a better lifestyle. Furthermore, when moving to a professional working environment, experts likely have a chance to enhance their skills and learn the intricacies, which helps them achieve better outcomes for citizens. Last but not least, preventing individuals from working abroad would also considerably impair the sharing of expertise and culture across international borders.
In conclusion, although it would be argued that letting skilled professionals go to other countries after finishing training courses could lead to a brain drain, I personally believe that the decisions about where to work should be up to them.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities What are the causes Suggest some measures to reduce traffic in big cities 95
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 52
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'a huge'.
Suggestion: a huge
...ore developed countries could result in a huge a huge drain brain and have detrimental effect...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 866, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... the economy of this developing country also. On the other hand, I would argue t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, as for, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2619047619 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05739225359 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.4553193147 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.333333333 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307448781854 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10086391934 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753474561099 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184076947224 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510246073258 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.