The line graphs demonstrate the proportion of houses owning electrical devices and the hours spent on housework in a week in a single country between 1920 and 2019.
Overall, it is clear that the ownership of electrical appliances rose over the 99 year period. In contrast, the number of hours of housework fell over the period, as less people did housekeeping.
In 1920, the two most common appliances were washing machines and vacuum cleaners, with figures of 40% and 30% respectively. While for refrigerators, fewer people owned them, without even reaching 5% of the households in total. During the given period, the figures for washing machines ownership fluctuated before reaching around 73% in the final year. However, as for the remaining two devices, there was a steady rise in their percentages which led to all houses owning them in 2019.
Throughout 99 years, the time spent on doing housework fell dramatically. In the year 1920, people's average time on housekeeping was 50 hours per week. Moreover, the hours decreased sharply to only 20 hours in a week. This decrease continued on till the final year and eventually ended at 11 hours of housework weekly in 2019.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries
- Nowadays it is becoming more popular to see animals to be kept in captivity for instance the zoo Do the advantage of keeping animal in the zoo outweigh the disadvantage 84
- In many countries the traditional customs are being lost What you think why this happens What schools and parents need to do to keep the traditional customs alive 84
- The diagram shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 89
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...s of housework fell over the period, as less people did housekeeping. In 1920, the ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'housekeep'
Suggestion: housekeep
...ell over the period, as less people did housekeeping. In 1920, the two most common applianc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02040816327 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77008398148 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59693877551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7949992529 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4545454545 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172068512824 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681283058442 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593227864633 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11391109097 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540060080696 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.