Wild tuna
The reading and the lecture are both about farming wild tuna. The author of the article provides three theories about supporting the claim that tuna farming will encounter several problems. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that there are promising solutions to these problems.
According to the reading, if female tuna are not free, they will not lay eggs, so abundant numbers of tuna is needed for this work. The article mentions that this procedure would decrease the population of tuna. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims this problem is not a big deal regarding new scientific advances. Additionally, he points out that tuna will lay eggs by injecting a particular hormone into them, and it does not have any health risk.
Secondly, the author suggests that this procedure is money-consuming since tuna feed on a certain protein which is exploited from other fish. In the article, it is said that tuna will become huge, and they need large amounts of food for survival. The
lecturer, however, asserts that the only source of this specific protein is not other fish. There are some plants that can produce this protein, so they would be processed for this purpose. He goes on to say that under this circumstance, tunas' price would be reduced, and it becomes inexpensive.
Finally, the author posits that some parasites will attack tuna and weaken them by clinging to them. The author contends that they become vulnerable to other diseases and they will die after a while. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is scientists find a solution to this problem. He notes that these kinds of parasites live in deep locations in oceans, and they cannot tolerate the conditions of the shore. So fostering tuna should take place near the coast.
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea 60
- Wild tuna 85
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues because in fossils the animals living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals Thus scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70 million ye 3
- Jane Austen s portrait 71
- declining in populations of yellow cedar 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...arming will encounter several problems. The lecturer disputes the claims made in th...
^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...the article. His position is that there are promising solutions to these problems. Accordi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 218, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...ill die after a while. In contrast, the lecturers stance is scientists find a solution to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9801980198 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52164220941 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557755775578 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3605594028 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.4210526316 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9473684211 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84210526316 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26355125468 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825942167922 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101702971508 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145003033494 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062456719735 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...arming will encounter several problems. The lecturer disputes the claims made in th...
^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...the article. His position is that there are promising solutions to these problems. Accordi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 218, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...ill die after a while. In contrast, the lecturers stance is scientists find a solution to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9801980198 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52164220941 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557755775578 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3605594028 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.4210526316 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9473684211 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84210526316 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26355125468 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825942167922 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101702971508 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145003033494 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062456719735 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.