The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The charts compare four retail sectors in Canada in terms of the proportion of their internet sales in two years, 2005 and 2010.
It is clear that the proportion of online sales for each of the four sectors changed significantly from 2005 to 2010. While the figures for food and beverages and video games increased, the statistics for the other two sectors fell.
In 2005, the proportion of online sales of food and beverages was 22%, but this rose to 32% in 2010. The percentage for internet sales of video games also went up, by 5% from the 2005 figure of 18%.
In contrast, the percentages of the online sales of the other sectors decreased. The most dramatic fall was in the home furnishings retail sector. While this figure was 25% of these four sectors’ total online sales in 2005, it fell to 15% in 2010. There was also a decrease in the electronics and appliances sector, which saw a fall from 35% in 2005 to 30% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-04-08 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Maju Chowdhury | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-05 | andreahoangbp | 78 | view |
- Sports encourage competition rather than cooperation Therefore sports should not be encouraged at school To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 91
- Some people think that the internet has brought people closer together while others think that people and communities are become more isolated Discuss both side and give your opinion 82
- Machines are becoming very sophisticated While machines enable individual workers to many benefits they cause some serious harm too Discuss the advantages and disadvantages machines bring to the workers and give your own opinion 84
- The map below shows the changes in an American town between 1948 and 2010 87
- The bar chart below shows the expenditure that people in two different countries spent on consumer goods in 2010 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56804733728 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41818617623 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473372781065 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.7129056938 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.7777777778 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259621515019 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12918611271 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522501698339 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188490037348 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371102147937 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56804733728 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41818617623 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473372781065 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.7129056938 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.7777777778 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259621515019 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12918611271 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522501698339 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188490037348 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371102147937 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.