The chart shows the rate of smoking in men and women in Britain between 1900 and 1950

Essay topics:

The chart shows the rate of smoking in men and women in Britain between 1900 and 1950.

The line graph compares information about the number of men and women smokers who smoked in 1900 and 1950 in Britain.

It is clear that the number of male smokers dropped significantly in Britain over a period of 50 years, while there was a gradual fluctuation in the rate of women smokers over the period shown.

It is observed that the rate of male smokers experienced a steady reduction from around 620 to 520 in the years 1900 and 1920, which was a decrease of 100. Between the years 1920 and 1935, there were about 520 people who smoked, mostly men, which dropped moderately to almost 380, a fall of 140 out of 1000 people in 15 years. Over the next 15 years, the figure of men who smoked in Britain reduced by 180, to 200, from 380.

On the other hand, there was a Sharp growth in the rate of female smokers roughly 90 in 1900 and 350 in 1920 as opposed to the number of women who smoked in the UK remained stable which showed at 350 from 1920 to 1930. In contrast, the decrease in the number of female smokers was significant, which diminished to approximately 350 in 1940 and 190 in 1950,a dip of 160 per 1000 people in 20 years.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (18 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-02 Maju Chowdhury 78 view
Essays by user Maju Chowdhury :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ho smoked in 1900 and 1950 in Britain. It is clear that the number of male smok...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f women smokers over the period shown. It is observed that the rate of male smo...
^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to approximately 350 in 1940 and 190 in 1950,a dip of 160 per 1000 people in 20 ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34418604651 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30999427559 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483720930233 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.1798573822 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7142857143 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274456333674 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135700917477 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952216437843 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18662129552 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932877989525 0.0819641961636 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.87 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.