Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowadays, many local states require their teenagers should be out to do the unpair work for helping their communities. This essay will shed some light on both pros and cos of it. Although this have several disadvantages, I still think that the advantages may be far more.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that there are some snags to requiring young people to do unpair work for helping local citizens. In fact, teenagers often have rebellious personality, which they don’t want to follow the available requirements. This has overwhelmingly negative reactions against their authorities. Therefore, they have any immoral behaviors and unfortunate results. Another point that need to be considered is that young generations use all their time for chatting in social media such as facebook, zalo, yahoo messenge , which they have not enough time for doing the unpair works.
Nevertheless, there are also many benefits to doing the unpair work for help local citizens by young people. Indeed, by doing the volunteer works, teenagers understand the value of friendship, which they often to think about the socially useful works such as helping other people, sympathizing with disabilities people. In addition, by doing the unpair job, young generation have no free time for breaking laws or having the negative behaviors. By way of illustration, there are no confliction in my neighbor in summer season because their children usually take part the unpair works. As a result, the number of negative factors effecting to social and community will be declined day by day.
In conclusion, I still hold the belief that disadvantages are overshadowed by advantages.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-14 Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ 78 view
2023-09-04 TLan168 56 view
2023-09-04 TLan168 56 view
2023-09-04 TLan168 56 view
2023-09-04 TLan168 78 view
Essays by user thuiinh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...a such as facebook, zalo, yahoo messenge , which they have not enough time for doi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26691729323 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8737991478 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601503759398 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3280559153 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.071428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269489136233 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852612103546 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956186098186 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144065502323 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620392358081 0.056905535591 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.