The table shows the number of mobile phones and personal computers per 1,000 people in 2003 in 6 different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table graph demonstrates the figure of ownership of electronic appliances in six distinct nations in 2003.
The data is calibrated in thousand.
The most striking feature to be observed is that the number of mobile phones and personal computers ownership was highest in Luxemburg, however China had the least.
It can be vividly seen that in case of mobile holders, Luxemburg had highest 872 per thousand people followed by Italy, Singapore and Germany with 737, 648,and 586 per thousand people respectively. South Korea was accounted for 380 per thousand people. China stood at the lowest position with 35 per thousand people.
Turning to the rest of description, for personal computers owners ( per thousand people) Luxemburg led with 900 people per thousand, whereas Singapore, Italy, Germany and South Korea occupied second, third and fourth positions with 690, 480 and 452 orderly. As far as comparisons are concerned, the figure of person computer owners was approximately 2.5 times more than mobile phone in China. Second, in case of person computer ownership, the digits of owners in Luxemburg was two times more as compare to China.
- Nowadays more and more older people compete with young people for the same jobs What can be the reasons for this What would you suggest as a solution 96
- Some people believe that children should have some classes outside their schools visiting local companies or public enterprises for having some real life experience To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that children s success in adulthood is related to the way they have been raised by their parents Do you agree or disagree Give your own opinion and examples 92
- Nowadays an increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during their life Is this a positive or negative development 92
- Some people think that government should invest in arts and cultural events Others think that government should spend money on more things Discuss both views with your own opinion 53
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...ons in 2003. The data is calibrated in thousand. The most striking feature to be obs...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... The data is calibrated in thousand. The most striking feature to be observed is...
^^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'computers'' or 'computer's'?
Suggestion: computers'; computer's
...he number of mobile phones and personal computers ownership was highest in Luxemburg, how...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...scription, for personal computers owners per thousand people Luxemburg led with 9...
^^
Line 6, column 491, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... owners in Luxemburg was two times more as compare to China.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24324324324 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66952610267 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3069255146 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196352170818 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823628302106 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551860857794 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990276303832 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641457937688 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...ons in 2003. The data is calibrated in thousand. The most striking feature to be obs...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... The data is calibrated in thousand. The most striking feature to be observed is...
^^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'computers'' or 'computer's'?
Suggestion: computers'; computer's
...he number of mobile phones and personal computers ownership was highest in Luxemburg, how...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...scription, for personal computers owners per thousand people Luxemburg led with 9...
^^
Line 6, column 491, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... owners in Luxemburg was two times more as compare to China.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24324324324 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66952610267 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3069255146 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196352170818 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823628302106 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551860857794 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990276303832 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641457937688 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.