The provided bar chart compares statistics on gross time spent by British people on three different types of phone calls over the 7-year period from 1995.
As is evident from the given information, the usage of local fixed lines was the highest among the three categories. While the indications for national and international as well as mobiles witnessed a constant growth throughout the period shown, the figure for local calls remained the same after 7 years.
In 1995, people in the UK used the local calls for around 72 billion minutes. Over the next 4 years, the figure increased considerably and reached a peak of 90 billion minutes. However, the opposite trend happened to the illustration of local calls in the second half of the research duration and returned to its initial status in 2002 with approximately 72 billion minutes called.
In terms of the other two types of phone calls, the spending in billion minutes on national and international calls was nine times higher than on mobiles- about 37 billion minutes compared to just only 4 billion minutes. Whereas the number of minutes of mobile calls experienced a significant rise and peaked at nearly 46 billion minutes over the following 7 years, the figure for national and international calls using landline rose to 60 billion minutes. In 2002, the gap between the two types was seen as the smallest in the amount of spending.
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 92
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 78
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...o types of phone calls, the spending in billion minutes on national and international c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94468085106 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65575555606 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548936170213 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.936828759 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.111111111 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255210683319 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105213189965 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577265235206 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147399934105 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499410315253 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.