The line graph compares statistics on the average quantity of travelers using three forms of transport per day over the period of 60 years from 1970 in the United Kingdom.
It is clear that the daily trend for car and train usage see a surge throughout the given period, while the number of bus users drops constantly in the UK. Meanwhile, cars are by far the most popular means of transport as a whole.
In 1970, around 4 million British commuters traveled by car, and this figure was 1 million lower than those traveling by car, with approximately 5 million. During the same period, rail passengers revealed the smallest figure, at about 2 million. Whereas the number of people who used car and train leveled off over the following 30 years, at well under 7 million and 3 million respectively, there was a slight fall in the number of UK bus users on the daily basis.
By 2030, cars are expected to go up dramatically and reach a peak of 9 million workers. Similarly, train travelers are also anticipated to double since the 2000s, to nearly 6 million. In contrast, people commuting buses had declined steadily by 1 million and had become the least prevalent choice. Interestingly, it is predicted that the biggest gap will be seen between two types of transport: car and bus.
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 78
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 73
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, well, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70666666667 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64798642345 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657777777778 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7954335519 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30508135666 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102255354715 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579369078941 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167043024356 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00961859826331 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.