The provided line graph illustrates the proportion of Australian population coming from America, Asia and other countries over the period from 1976 to 2011.
Overall, the percentage of residents originating from Asia and other nations experienced an upward trend in contrast to a decline in the figure for Uk. Over the given years, Asia witnessed the most significant growth in the number of people residing in Australia.
Turning to the detail, in 1976, the foreign people accounted for approximately 23% of the total population, but then it underwent a minimal decrease to just over 20% in 2001 prior to a small rebound to 25% at the end of the period. While the figure for other countries stood at only around 11% in 1976, after that, it increased erratically to hit the peak of 14% in 2006 and then decreased to around 12% in 2011.
Regarding the remaining categories, around 14% of the Australian population in 1976 was from Uk compared to only just over 2% from Asia. However, in the following years, the figure for Americans accommodating in Australia went down considerably to merely 5% in 2011. Meanwhile, the proportion of Asians living in Australia underwent a dramatic increase up to 15% by the end of the period.
- The table below shows the number of visitors in the UK and their average spending from 2003 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents 73
- Some people focus on news in their country while others think it is more important to be aware of international news Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and 84
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, then, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91826923077 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85380581948 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543269230769 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4372716089 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.142857143 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7142857143 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15532187687 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719800030993 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516175190723 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103339643824 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535024019486 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.