Some people believe that team working is a great way for students to learn to work together as a group helping each other. Although working in groups is a good habit and makes pupils ready for future jobs they will get, because we all mostly work in jobs requiring team skills, I strongly disagree with how the projects are graded equally for all of the members of the team for three reasons put forth as follows.
First of all, evaluating every member of the group with the same grade is not fair. Some individuals of the team may work less or do their jobs weakly. While other members may do their best to give a better report of what they do. As a result, giving the members an equal mark seems unfair. For example, if leader of the team compensates for the jobs that must be done by another team member, then how we can consider a single and equal score for all of them? So, it is better to mark them according to their efforts rather than just by participating in a team.
Second of all, current education system is based on reward-punishment strategy. Accordingly, if a student performs well, he is encouraged by getting high marks. We can generalize this situation to group work too. For example, if we punish lethargic students, who do not do what they have to, then we will make them do their responsbilites. Otherwise, we can not force them to do their business in groups they belong to. Hence, when we consider this important point, though it is a hard thing to accomplish, everyone in the group will try to do their part and get works done to get a high score.
Last but not least, every student will hold a position in the future in society. If he or she knows from his education time that everyone gets as much work as he or she has done, then we will have a successful companies and productive society at the end. But, grading every member the same mark goes against this. Thus, it is beneficial for students themselves and society as well to make them accountable for what they proceed.
In conclusion, even though some may argue that every person of a group must recieve the same score, I mostly refute this for three reasons mentioned above.
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 70
- driverless cars 75
- Spartacus the rebel leader who fought against the Romans with an army of fellow escaped slaves is one of the most famous figures in ancient Roman history Spartacus led his men against their Roman oppressors and managed to defeat the Roman army in several 83
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago there was a mass extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 14 70
- In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book manuscript written on vellum vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper The Voynich manuscript as it became known resembl 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...how the projects are graded equally for all of the members of the team for three reasons p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... may work less or do their jobs weakly. While other members may do their best to give...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r than just by participating in a team. Second of all, current education system ...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his for three reasons mentioned above.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52284263959 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46302241664 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2826495464 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7894736842 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7368421053 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301027168859 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104954733606 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892197907755 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169353264371 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528359699297 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.