Some working parents think that childcare centres provide the best care for children who are still too young to go to school. Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their children.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this hustling and bustling pace of life where parents are tied to a nine-to-five schedule of office hours, the conundrum of caregivers for their preschool children in lieu of them is permeative. A consensus is of opinion that grandparents are perfectly well-suited for this goal, while others place faith in nurseries. I shall analyze both notions in the forthcoming paragraphs followed by a conclusion stating my standpoint in favor of the latter.
Kinship lays the underpinning of grandparents’ capability of overtaking child care. As a saying goes “blood is thicker than water”, offsprings are far from vulnerable under supervision of people in the same genealogy book with affections and caring on par with their parents’. In addition, with grandparents’ wisdom and life experiences comes profound education in social norms and life skills for toddlers to become better citizens of society. More importantly, abundant time reserves of retired seniors would tantamount to devotion of even more attention to the children’s well-being, rendering grandparents suitable as both conscientious caregivers and educators. However, most grandparents lack adequate training in early education for their offsprings and not every family has grandparents to do this work.
On the other hand, childcare centers serve as a better alternative corroborated by qualifications of the caretakers. With adequate education and diverse experience of nursery staffs, children are able to grow whilst bathing in suitable education of what they should be learning. These centres’ facilities including toys and studying materials are usually better furnished than at home so as to provide optimal education. More importantly, vast availability of fellow partners during nursery care also empowers the children to form social skills and relationships. By and large, these institutions foster children’s comprehensive growth. Despite instances of abusive malpractices and outrageous behaviors hitting the headlines, careful vetting of such kindergartens would help to avoid this hazard.
In conclusion, grandparents are suitable carers for their offsprings; however, with careful selection, nursery homes would do a better job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-20 | hungdung2507 | 89 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | Naz01 | 56 | view |
- Many cities around the world are considering turning streets into car free zones which help curb pollution and make people healthier However some people believe that cities will suffer once this becomes the norm In your opinion what are the advantages and 85
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- There are a lot of positives and negatives about using public transport Discuss both sides 78
- Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school, some people believe that this has negative development while others think there are some benefits. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 84
- Technology can be a threat to the survival of a language but it can also serve as a powerful tool to preserve even restore languages Discuss the statement and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... caregivers for their preschool children in lieu of them is permeative. A consens...
^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e usually better furnished than at home so as to provide optimal education. More importa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8282208589 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27447630001 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625766871166 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1364564342 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264781989843 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771309502654 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387816844731 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152814956682 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178570668331 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.