Some people believe that international trade and communication with other countries is a positive trend, while others think it is harmful to nations and they might lose their identities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant examples.
One of the most important factorials nowadays for a nation to develop is international and communication. With that advancement, some people think the trend is beneficial, while others think it is bad for nations. From my perspective, interaction between a variety of regions is essential for creating favorable conditions that will assist the nation's development. In this paragraph below, I will partly discuss and explain the reason for my points of view.
In the term of negative, doing international trade may hurt the fame of some national brands. For instance, most of Vietnamese people prefer to drink Coca-Cola. That mean many of the country's brands have poor financial standing, which could cause the nation to decrease gradually. Additionally, employees of some well-known industrial enterprises will be replaced by excellent foreigners. It explains that a number of people may not have jobs in their own countries.
Opposite the adverse side of global trade, opening up the market to foreign investment will benefit the home country profusely. That means the economy of poor countries will increase and become the develope countries. Furthermore, international trade will enhance people's knowledge in poor nations. That is because there will be an increase the skill and learning when large countries work with and invest in developing countries. Finally, the most crucial things of global communication is to stop failure of economy, civilization and the development of poor countries.
In conclusion, there are many ways to develope nations, one of them is worldwide trade and communicate. As a result, I completely agree with the suggest that trend is benefical.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-13 | harmankaur1203 | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | Koi | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | cleee | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | Huyle121212 | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | Huyle121212 | 61 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 36
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 345, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...vorable conditions that will assist the nations development. In this paragraph below, I...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e. As a result, I completely agree with the suggest that trend is benefical.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, may, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43511450382 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06188715715 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591603053435 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.7720292571 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218505165314 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718430278364 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699092585593 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126302973817 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279411414573 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.