Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer.
What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems?
It is true that the gap between the rich and the poor has widened. The reason for this is that the rich become wealthier and the poor become destitute. In the following paragraph, I will discuss about this situation, how it affects the globe, and how to address it.
Firstly, the problem it created was rather enormous. For a more detailed explanation, in current modern and developing era, the majority of corporations choose to hire exceptional employees. That means that many poor individuals will not be exposed to work and will have trouble getting a good job for creating money. Due to the fact that, the poverty and crime proportion become more increasing day by day. Accordingly, the poor will be willing to do anything, regardless of whether it is legal or not, just to survive.
Nevertheless, there are a number of benefical methods to solve this issue. First, providing free education to poor people and give them a good condition to live. Moreover, the government can employ a progressive tax and benefits system which imposes proportionately more tax on those with higher levels of income, and redistributes welfare benefits to poor people. Therefore, even those in poverty may live well on a tiny sum of money from that taxation. Finally, giving the poor a suitable job is the greatest way for them. In fact, helping poor people find a secure job can help to improve their well-being and other long-term benefits, which can also boost the domestic economy.
In conclusion, there are certain adverse effects caused by the widening wealth inequality. However, I believe that problem will be resolved in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | NUT | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that international trade and communication with other countries is a positive trend while others think it is harmful to nations and they might lose their identities To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your 61
- Some people believe that international trade and communication with other countries is a positive trend while others think it is harmful to nations and they might lose their identities To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your 67
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97802197802 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75845822208 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0410961987 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9375 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266005575603 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768996167807 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638337343533 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138856999613 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583131671031 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.