Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the importance of parenteral presence in children's education has been gaining a great deal of attention throughout society. It is true that children cannot grow up perfectly without a parenteral presence. Most importantly, the issue has become a bone of contention among academic and psychological experts regarding its necessity to build a strong family. I completely agree with the school of thought and it seems to me that parenteral involvement in children's education is a natural way to build an intimate relationship among the family and also improves the self-confidence of children.
First of all, parenteral involvement in children's education is a natural way to create an intimate relationship among the family. Though, parents in our time are far busier than ever before, spending quality time with children to assist with their homework might be a way to form a family bond. This means children will not only learn new things but also feel the warmth of family bonding and at the same time, parents will understand their children in a better way. This can be exemplified by the initiatives in Taiwan for the last few decades where the parenteral presence is encouraged to form a strong family. This is reflected in Taiwan’s bonding of families where an averagely of only 2% of divorced cases were found in the last five years.
Secondly, parenteral presence inevitably enhances the self-confidence of children. This means doing homework with children will help the parents to understand their children’s strengths and weaknesses in a particular subject and can act accordingly. As a result, the self-confidence of children will be enhanced significantly and it could be a great trigger to release the inner potentiality of children in their next period of life. An empirical survey conducted in the UK last year reflects the same notion. The survey shows that children who had parents' guidance in doing their homework in school life were 40% more confident in their tasks compared to those who were not supervised directly by their parents. Therefore, having parenteral supervision in helping with home tasks might be an important initiative for the well-being of young aspirants.
All things considered, parenteral presence in youngsters' education is essential to form an intimate family bonding and improving the self-confidence of children.
- Some people believe that technology has made the world a better place while others think it has caused more problems than it has solved Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both sides and give your opinion 92
- Nowadays young people lack an understanding of how to manage their finances after they finish high school Explain why they do not know how to manage money and how this can be changed 78
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 61
- Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 609, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proves the self-confidence of children. First of all, parenteral involvement in ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... is encouraged to form a strong family. This is reflected in Taiwan’s bonding of fam...
^^^^
Line 8, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roving the self-confidence of children.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30606860158 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07325460503 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498680738786 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7610389598 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.6875 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6875 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29329472328 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969009757627 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112132792943 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160373707182 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107889132229 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.