Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems
Some criminals indeed commit crimes again after they have been punished for the first time, and such offenders are increasingly widespread across society. Most importantly, the issue has been a bone of contention among psychologists and sociologists regarding its repetition at an alarming rate. To the best of my knowledge, there are specific reasons which are burgeoning this trend, and the various imperative implication should be applied to curb it.
The principal reason is the lack of rehabilitation counseling during imprisonment. As a result, criminal viewpoints regarding the offense will remain the same, or even it can be worsening. Therefore, after the duration of the penalty, it is very likely for them to commit other unlawful activities. Probably the second most important reason behind this is the issue of unemployment due to criminal background. This has resulted in them being involved in further illegal activities to overcome the financial challenge, leading them to be a regular criminal in society. So, lack of employment has a direct link with such repetition.
When dealing with the first reason, an effective way to work it out would be to initiate and implement cognitive-behavioral therapy or CBT by the government. This will help the offenders understand the deeper meaning of life and rejuvenate their moral standards, allowing them to change their perception of crimes. In the UK, for example, every offender in their custody must enroll in such a CBT program. Because of that, only 4% of criminals had found with a second-time criminal record. Reaction to the second issue is arranging vocational education and training programs by the prison authority so that they could live in society by utilizing such experiences. In China, for instance, each criminal must learn practical work-based training such as preparing handy-craft items, repairing electronics, driving, and the like. Therefore, it will allow them to live independently without making further illegal efforts.
In conclusion, to tackle the reappearance of wrongdoings, it is necessary to provide them with psychological treatment and practical training to change their insight and live self-reliantly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-07 | Raspreet s. | 73 | view |
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both sides and give your opinion 92
- Nowadays young people lack an understanding of how to manage their finances after they finish high school Explain why they do not know how to manage money and how this can be changed 78
- Some people believe that technology has made the world a better place while others think it has caused more problems than it has solved Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems 89
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48529411765 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16429447359 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3376995305 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.705882353 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153254585543 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441131781807 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472875639383 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914666920359 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516025139321 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.