The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 to 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph compares three different call types – local, national and international, and mobiles spent by the people in the UK for the period between 1995 and 2002. Local, national and international calls could be made by fixed line whereas mobile is considered for all types of calls. Overall, the minutes on calls increased throughout 7 years except for the local calls.
It is apparent that, the most popular type of calls amongst the UK was local call throughout the projected periods. The local call shows the parabola line where it reached its peak of 90 billion of minutes in 1999 and it dropped to about 70 billion of minutes in 2002, which number is same as those in 1995. The national and international calls used by the UK citizens showed the steadily incremental to show the smallest gap in the year of 2002 of around 60 billion of minutes. The preference of using for national and international calls increased by more than 1.5% (from 35 billion of minutes in 1995), whilst the mobile phone usages have skyrocketed to reach at more than 40 billion of minutes.
- The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980. 70
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 70
- the development of a fishing village to the hotel resort 70
- The question is showing in the attached picture. 80
- The charts below show the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education Summarize the information by selecting and reporting on the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
it reached its peak of 90 billion of minutes in 1999 and it dropped to about 70 billion of minutes in 2002, which number is same as those in 1995.
Description: 'which' refers to what?
flaws:
Number of Paragraphs: 2 4
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 187 200
No. of Characters: 868 1000
No. of Different Words: 100 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.698 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.642 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.543 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 54 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.43 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.286 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.513 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.627 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.184 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 2 4